A Discussion Thread in the Pwnzalot Drama
Moi: Okay, Pwnzalot lied. Now what? Everyone lies, you (reader) included, humankind is very prone to believe they own the world even when they screw up big time. Now I'm tempted to watch her stream, just to see how badly this level of harassment impacted her life.
ConkerTS: So to you, someone being shown up for cheating is 'harassment'? You must lack any sense of fair play at all. Normal people don't like cheating, and tend to be disgusted by it, and can be pretty vocal about it, and rightly so. Oh, and you can say things like "Everyone lies, you (reader) included.", if you like, but that doesn't make the point that you think it does. Yes, we all lie, but most of us don't lie to the extent of claiming the credit for something that 99.9% of the world could never mange to do, if it's even possible to do without cheating. Nor do we then insult the people who rightly point out that cheating (now that is genuine 'harassment', albeit of a very minor and ineffectual sort). Please try to understand this; SHE is the one who cheated. So you trying (and failing) to paint her as the victim, when she is a cheat and a liar, is not only stupid, but also dishonest.
Moi: Back then there used to be cheat codes in games that you could take advantages of to make the game easier, harder or weirder. Heck, using Action Replays you could even tweak the code to get infinite MPs or ammo, that way you could enjoy your gameplay in a different manner (if at all when you're visually impaired). ‘Normal people don't like cheating’? Yeah, right. I don't like cheaters in multiplayer games (both coop and versus) because their fun often ruins mine. I do appreciate the fact that all speedruns and achievements are monitored by fans to point out when someone tries to brag about with ill intent. When this happens, people like Billy Mitchell are rightfully stripped down of their titles as they fall into oblivion. Now what I do highlight in my comment is how videos about this drama are piling up as if Pwnzalot was the new Bobby Kotick or "Mr DMCA" Acerthorn. She's just a liar, nothing more, nothing less. Hence my first question: now, what?
ConkerTS: No, what you did in your first post was to try to seem morally superior to people who who are against someone trying to cheat the whole world in to believing that she hadn't actually done. That is why decent people are so disgusted with what she has done. SHE chose to fake the run. SHE chose to broadcast it to the world. SHE, when called out on it, instead of admitting the truth, lied about it and tried to discredit the people who were rightly accusing her. She deserves all of the criticism. In any other competitive field (such as athletics, swimming, even science, etc) if she had cheated on the world stage (which is tantamount to streaming your cheating for anyone, wherever they are in the world, to see) then she would receive criticism, disdain, and a total loss of respect and trust from that sport/game and it's community. So why should she not share that same fate. And remember, she is getting off much lighter than say an athlete who is discovered to be talking performance enhancing drugs; she's not even remotely as famous as an athlete, so most people won't know or remember her, especially not a few weeks from now. It's not like the newspapers or TV will occasionally reference her, as they might with the athlete. You say " Yeah, right. I don't like cheaters in multiplayer games (both coop and versus) because their fun often ruins mine.", after having the gross hypocrisy of criticizing people who dared to find fault with Queen Pwnzalot;s cheating. The fact that she wasn't playing multiplayer, but instead was trying to attain credit for something she couldn't do in real life is different from cheating in a multiplayer game, yes, but no less despicable. And yes, I am aware of the once common in-game cheats modes, and the existence of cheat cartridges. And I miss them, especially since now I can't play most of the first person shooters of the last decade or two using cheats to allow me to play through the game using just my favourite weapons and infinite ammunition. But that is for fun, not to con the world into thinking I have done something that I in reality have not done. And even if someone does cheats to complete a single player game, then there's nothing dishonest in that, as long as they don't deny it. But using cheats to complete a game, then saying that they completed that game without cheats (unless they previously did complete it without cheats), is wrong, and much more so if they lied on the internet to hundreds or thousands of other gamers, and much more so if the act (in this case, completing the game without cheats, in QP's case, defeating the boss character whilst blindfolded) is extremely hard or even considered impossible to do.
***
Moi (version 1): @ConkerTS And your whole point is to highlight that higher moral ground of mine with the "people have a right to be outraged" argument, which I never even denied in the first place. Congrats!